Comments on: Twitter vs. Facebook vs. Google+

By: IntelliSign Apps

IntelliSign Apps — Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:54:00 +0000

Helpful

By: Goshisanniichi

Goshisanniichi — Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:23:00 +0000

All social networking sites are fads. Eventually something will be made that will replace Twitter and Facebook like Facebook replaced MySpace. Whatever replaces those will eventually be replaced by something else.

By: Goshisanniichi

Goshisanniichi — Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:23:00 +0000

By: Goshisanniichi

Goshisanniichi — Sun, 04 Sep 2011 14:23:00 +0000

By: Lady

Lady — Sun, 14 Aug 2011 17:03:00 +0000

I don’t have time to accommodate a flood of requests everyday. This may be a drawback with Facebook that isn’t even doable with Twitter and that’s one among the explanations I dig Twitter thus abundant. I will follow who I need on Twitter and I get one screen to look at throughout the day to see if there’s anything interesting I’d like to travel observe or respond to.

By: Drewmonge

Drewmonge — Fri, 12 Aug 2011 09:23:00 +0000

Comparing Google+ with Twitter is like comparing apples with oranges in my opinion, in terms of the approach and nature of each client. Although I like this analysis, this would have been a better “Facebook Vs. Google+” stand off rather than a “Google+ Vs. Twitter” stand off. Of course Google+ is going to win when it comes to features and usability. Let’s not forget, Twitter is a micro blog. And also, its popularity and integration in society at this point. (Although, I know that could change as easily as it did from MySpace to Facebook.)

Anyways, but to answer the last question posed, I think given a little time, Google+ will be giving Facebook a run for its money.

By: Matthew

Matthew — Wed, 10 Aug 2011 16:42:00 +0000

Misses some Facebook features – Pages have a unidirectional follow relationship, while groups, both “old groups” and new groups add an additional dimension